<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stealing &gt; Imitation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/12/stealing-imitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/12/stealing-imitation/</link>
	<description>Fill/Stroke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:14:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: smick</title>
		<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/12/stealing-imitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>smick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/?p=540#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>This is the trouble with living in the digital age. As great as it is to be able to send something instantly to someone else, we also have to deal with the ease of copying. But you benefit from the openness, so it&#039;s not necessarily the best idea to close thigns off (hiding html css code) 

You could look across cultures at design from the past and see where an artists&#039;s work simply couldn&#039;t be recreated easily because the work was so skillfully done, duplication too difficult for most. Those paintings can be mass produced posters now, more people can see the imagery. We benefit a lot from living in these times. Products created faster, information faster, learning easier.

When you think of this topic It&#039;s all about what people consider &quot;bad&quot; in their hearts for themselves. If they&#039;re personal rewards are higher for an original work which required a certain amount of learning they wanted to do, they will follow that path. Some just want money. And when they have money, they don&#039;t care about what they did to get it. Designers are not the worst category of industrialist for this behavior.

With cover bands, you have to remember that some people just love playing music, love the crowds and are creating a show based on what people can&#039;t see from the original. Led Zeppelin isn&#039;t touring, but a cover band can be a good alternative. And that band loves playing their favorites for themselves and for you. And they should earn the money doing that at a venue. People like to see how good cover bands do. 

Architecture in many different centuries was copied and it was part of that period of time and region. I think if you keep growing and changing your own design, you&#039;ll always be a step ahead. The present moment in many ways is all that counts anyway.  Dwell on the copiers and the leeches and how far into that state of mind do you let yourself go. Far enough to distract you from your own goals?

So many industries and craftsmen have had to deal with technology making their work easier. Continue to take advantage of what the technology gives you. You know that you try to copy yourself after you do something good. Reuse that framework, those stylesheets, those flash slideshows. So you can move just as fast as copiers can. They aren&#039;t making you worse.

And I think it&#039;s good for the masses too that copiers are out there. Because people in business tend to extract as much as they can from an invention. When copies are out there, they learn they can&#039;t just not compete and sit on their invention forever getting royalties. It sucks, but the more you want to regulate, litigate stall the process, the more time you spend on that and not creating. Probably the less you are creating, the slower technolgy progresses by whatever increment you were contributing.

I just read this quote on Digg or Metafilter or something and I thought it was very interesting, I kind of appreciate it more than maybe I would have a couple years ago. The concept was all about authenticity.That&#039;s the question. What makes something authentic? 
http://log.scifihifi.com/post/68006873/nothing-is-original-steal-from-anywhere-that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the trouble with living in the digital age. As great as it is to be able to send something instantly to someone else, we also have to deal with the ease of copying. But you benefit from the openness, so it&#8217;s not necessarily the best idea to close thigns off (hiding html css code) </p>
<p>You could look across cultures at design from the past and see where an artists&#8217;s work simply couldn&#8217;t be recreated easily because the work was so skillfully done, duplication too difficult for most. Those paintings can be mass produced posters now, more people can see the imagery. We benefit a lot from living in these times. Products created faster, information faster, learning easier.</p>
<p>When you think of this topic It&#8217;s all about what people consider &#8220;bad&#8221; in their hearts for themselves. If they&#8217;re personal rewards are higher for an original work which required a certain amount of learning they wanted to do, they will follow that path. Some just want money. And when they have money, they don&#8217;t care about what they did to get it. Designers are not the worst category of industrialist for this behavior.</p>
<p>With cover bands, you have to remember that some people just love playing music, love the crowds and are creating a show based on what people can&#8217;t see from the original. Led Zeppelin isn&#8217;t touring, but a cover band can be a good alternative. And that band loves playing their favorites for themselves and for you. And they should earn the money doing that at a venue. People like to see how good cover bands do. </p>
<p>Architecture in many different centuries was copied and it was part of that period of time and region. I think if you keep growing and changing your own design, you&#8217;ll always be a step ahead. The present moment in many ways is all that counts anyway.  Dwell on the copiers and the leeches and how far into that state of mind do you let yourself go. Far enough to distract you from your own goals?</p>
<p>So many industries and craftsmen have had to deal with technology making their work easier. Continue to take advantage of what the technology gives you. You know that you try to copy yourself after you do something good. Reuse that framework, those stylesheets, those flash slideshows. So you can move just as fast as copiers can. They aren&#8217;t making you worse.</p>
<p>And I think it&#8217;s good for the masses too that copiers are out there. Because people in business tend to extract as much as they can from an invention. When copies are out there, they learn they can&#8217;t just not compete and sit on their invention forever getting royalties. It sucks, but the more you want to regulate, litigate stall the process, the more time you spend on that and not creating. Probably the less you are creating, the slower technolgy progresses by whatever increment you were contributing.</p>
<p>I just read this quote on Digg or Metafilter or something and I thought it was very interesting, I kind of appreciate it more than maybe I would have a couple years ago. The concept was all about authenticity.That&#8217;s the question. What makes something authentic?<br />
<a href="http://log.scifihifi.com/post/68006873/nothing-is-original-steal-from-anywhere-that" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/log.scifihifi.com');" rel="nofollow">http://log.scifihifi.com/post/68006873/nothing-is-original-steal-from-anywhere-that</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antpaw</title>
		<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/12/stealing-imitation/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>antpaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/?p=540#comment-738</guid>
		<description>nice read here :)
but i dont think you should be so disappointed about this, if every &quot;designer&quot; would do something that noone has ever done befor it would be so much harder to comeup with a fresh idea.
and if your idea is really that good noone will take the copycats seriously, like the aqua effect, if i see it i only think of apple. this makes the original owner even more famous. sorry for my english :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice read here :)<br />
but i dont think you should be so disappointed about this, if every &#8220;designer&#8221; would do something that noone has ever done befor it would be so much harder to comeup with a fresh idea.<br />
and if your idea is really that good noone will take the copycats seriously, like the aqua effect, if i see it i only think of apple. this makes the original owner even more famous. sorry for my english :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Taking Initiative the Best Form of Flattery? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/12/stealing-imitation/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Taking Initiative the Best Form of Flattery? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/?p=540#comment-672</guid>
		<description>[...] This situation really chapped my ass (I love that saying)! Around this time, I also read this great post by Mark Dudlik, a Twitter buddy, about the difference between stealing and imitating in the design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This situation really chapped my ass (I love that saying)! Around this time, I also read this great post by Mark Dudlik, a Twitter buddy, about the difference between stealing and imitating in the design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
