<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save Polaroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/08/save-polaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/08/save-polaroid/</link>
	<description>Fill/Stroke</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: md</title>
		<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/08/save-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/?p=467#comment-155</guid>
		<description>http://www.polaroidshow.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.polaroidshow.com/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.polaroidshow.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aw</title>
		<link>http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/2008/08/save-polaroid/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>aw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fillslashstroke.com/slash/?p=467#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I heard that Fuji Film is going to keep making their version of the Polaroid 600 film. So it won't be Polaroid brand, but it will be the same format and should work in the cameras. However, I've 

1. Never seen it and 
2. Don't know if that's still true.

I sure do hope so though. :[</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that Fuji Film is going to keep making their version of the Polaroid 600 film. So it won&#8217;t be Polaroid brand, but it will be the same format and should work in the cameras. However, I&#8217;ve </p>
<p>1. Never seen it and<br />
2. Don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s still true.</p>
<p>I sure do hope so though. :[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
